
The hardware I'm using started off life as a Dan, however since I've replaced
the motherboard, processor, graphics card, disk controller and memory and
added a new hard disk, CD-ROM drive, modem and sound card there isn't a
huge amount left of the original. Never mind, I must say I was impressed
with what I got when I first bought it, so I suppose a plug
for Dan is well deserved.
The main operating system I use is Windows NT 4.0 - at least as far as useful work is concerned. I've also recently installed Linux, and this seems to take up the vast mjority of the time I actually spend on the computer. I also still have my original DOS/Windows 3.11 partition lurking in the shadows of my hard disk, though the few programs which weren't compatible with Windows NT have been long since replaced so this is really only for historical interest now.
I'm currently using Netscape 4 but when I've
remembered I've also checked the pages with Internet Explorer, so no
"You MUST download 10 Megs of Netscape before viewing this page"
messages. Well, not until they offer to pay me, anyway. The HTML has
also been checked against one or other of the official HTML standards,
so the tiny minority (according to the
stats) using anything else should also be Ok. I've tried not to
forget that the whole purpose of HTML is to ensure a good result which
is independent of the hardware or software on the other end.
The only time you're likely to have a problem is if you're using a browser that doesn't support tables. I've tried to remember to put a <BR> at the end of every line, but it'll still be a bit of a mess I'm afraid.
My experience with HTML editors is poor, to say the least. Every one I've tried so far had ideas about HTML source formating that were radically different from mine. They all seem to insist on reformating the entire page, even if you're only using them as a spell checker. I'm probably not using them as the makers intended, but even then, I don't expect them to muck around with bits of code I've put in when they're nothing to do with the bit I was editing. I especially don't expect then to delete my comments and replace them with their own, like Netscapes' editor did.
Some pages are lightly Java enhanced in places, however this isn't anything fundamental and should (hopefully) be invisible to those browsers that don't support this. Netscape v.2, Internet Explorer v.3 and Opera v.3 should all produce almost indistinguishable results.
There aren't too many pictures on my pages, mainly because I can't draw and haven't got around to stealing any good ones, but even when I do there won't be too many - I have to pay for my on-line time so if I find a page overloaded with pictures I tend to just go somewhere else altogether, so I haven't assumed everybody else is any different. [Ok. So I've just stuck a 57Kb picture on this very page. So sue me.]