![]() |
|
| p21.Romantic language was originally one of revolution; lovers against parents, by woman against control of their affections; with love as a thunderbolt from heaven, uncontrollable, to which we are willing victims. |
| p26 We can move beyond reiterating our helplessness and disarray;
with depictions of despair and incoherence to make us more helpless.
We seem stuck on the value of introspection. Asking 'who am I?' whilst other people are infinitely more interesting and have infinitely more to say. e.g. Gary Witheford and Peter White. - potential/poverty/q2.htm |
| p29 heros etc self confidence without arrogance, theatre in our homes |
| p35. In conversation feelings are handed back and forth until an intimacy develops; so we learn to put the horse before the cart. |
| p46. The family is shaped [and similarly p50 work
is shaped] by the direction in which it points its conversations.
The sadness is that a dysfunctional family [firm or school] knows no conversation but only obedience to those who know best. |
| p59. . . those who want jobs which will make them better people.
Zeldin seems not to have sensed the potential
of our fundamental
|
| p79. develop a new kind of conversation which is both hopeful
and aware of the likelihood of failure
p80. if we see our lives as a series of experiments, we would be less discouraged by our inevitable failures. Similarly Edward Said's "normadic, migratory and anti narrative energy" offers us a viable way out from the arrogance of seeing ourselves in perpetuity, driven by ideas of introspection. (p26 above) |
| Which is where we came in; and it's been here all the time for we are realising there is a metalanguage based on realising the potential of our fundamental needs, and being aware of qualified satisfaction. |